A Grand Light
Comments by Greg Collins on Fri, 08/07/09 00:04 Comments by Jan Bjorklund on Fri, 08/07/09 09:37 I like the manner in which you captured the sunlight highlighted the rugged slopes of the Grand Canyon, the interplay of sunlight and shadows, and the contrast between the rugged broken rock formation of the canyon and the almost ruler like straight nature of the distant ridge. I prefer the slightly tighter cropped comment version... Comments by S Roter on Fri, 08/07/09 09:47 These are both great images, views that you would see in a National Geographic magazine. I prefer the crop on the 2nd image, though prefer the contrast on the OP. Comments by Tony Scheuhammer on Fri, 08/07/09 11:49 The crop is much better, imo. The first thing I thought when I saw the OP was that the darkness in the bottom half of the image was overwhelming and distracting; the crop fixes that.
Comments by Paul Bracey on Fri, 08/07/09 12:01 I disagree. One of the strong points in the OP is how the light fades away on the cliff on the right. I much prefer that version. Comments by Jeff Dye on Fri, 08/07/09 12:11 Good morning Greg. I like the OP but prefer the cropped version. In the cropped version
Comments by Kara Williams on Fri, 08/07/09 14:34 Either version works for me. My eyes are drawn immediately to the central portion of the image where the light streams accross the mountains and sky thus exposing the textures. Comments by Alias on Fri, 08/07/09 16:51 I'm with Paul.
Comments by Mo Fridlich on Fri, 08/07/09 19:12 Ditto! The OP emphasizes the sunny highlights. Comments by Ernest Cadegan on Fri, 08/07/09 20:55 Initially I ws drawn to the OP as my preference but viewing here tonight in a darkened room the cropped version dominates. Comments by Tom Manson on Fri, 08/07/09 22:47 Both beautiful. I prefer the second version due to more detail in the lower canyon.
original. no question. The cropped version has been proccessed differently and lightened up the lower areas that are present in both images. The OP for me but with a little bit more detail as has come out in the second post.
Ken Burns couldn't do it any better. |
|